AI helps us build Ignition projects faster and analyze the process data your gateway already collects. A senior engineer designs, reviews, tests and commissions anything that touches live equipment, and that engineer's name goes on the commissioning report.
We use AI in two places: building the Ignition project, and looking through process data for failure patterns, lost capacity and the causes of scrap. The logic that runs your equipment is standard Ignition logic, and an engineer reviews it, tests it and is responsible for it.
Your gateway collects more process data than anyone has time to review. These are questions a dashboard usually does not answer:
The usual concern about AI in a plant is a model writing to live tags with no one responsible for it. We do not work that way.
Whether we use AI to build the Ignition project or to find patterns in process data, a senior engineer designs, reviews, tests and commissions the result. What runs on your gateway is the same predictable Ignition logic it would be without AI.
The same standard should apply to work your own engineers do with AI. A free Ignition MRI reviews everything in one gateway backup, whoever or whatever wrote it, and ranks every risk it finds. If you want a senior engineer working inside your team, see engineering support.
No. We use AI to build faster and to look through process data. Anything that writes to live equipment is gated, reviewed and commissioned by a senior engineer.
We read before we write, writes are gated, and each integration has access only to what the job requires.
For routine screens and scripts, often nothing. That work has become much faster. We add value in architecture that holds up as the system grows, integration across SCADA, MES and ERP, behavior under load, and a senior engineer who is responsible for what reaches production.
Call us, and an engineer will tell you whether the process data you already collect can answer it.
Contact us →